As a result, her guns are crammed closer together. Cesare isn't a very large vessel - she's shorter in length than many of the cruisers within her matchmaking spread. The second factor is the proximity of Cesare's guns to one another. They still occur, but more rarely than on other battleships like König or Iron Duke. In practice this means there are fewer 'wonky' shots where shells fly every which way. The higher the sigma value, the more likely shells will land towards the center of the dispersion field. Giulio Cesare boasts a sigma value of 1.9 which is a marginal improvement over the usual 1.8 value found on tier V battleships. This comes down to three factors: Her sigma value, the size of the ship and the number of guns she wields. Her guns feel far more accurate than what her dispersion value would suggest. It's kind of hard for me to believe she's stricken with German dispersion values. As it would fall out, I did find an elegant solution to that charging gunship-destroyer problem. It's like asking a cross-eyed Farragut to save your life from a rampaging Podvoisky and the fool loads AP instead of HE.Īs it turned out, getting that close with Giulio Cesare is generally a loser move anyway (see her protection scheme below), so having mediocre secondaries isn't that much of a loss.
They have a maximum alpha strike of 2,000 damage per if they citadel and they're not going to do that often. In of itself, AP shells from secondaries can be good if they've got a lot of hitting power. except that point number two is that her 120mm guns (which form the backbone of her secondary armament) fire AP shells. Anyway, I could over look this in of itself. I mean, 10rpm isn't terrible but it's not ideal.
Each gun fires 10rpm - a whisker shy of the 12rpm I hope to see on secondaries at a minimum - especially for low caliber weapons like 100mm guns. Giulio Cesare's secondaries don't have quite the rate of fire I was hoping.
0 kommentar(er)
